Ir al contenido principal

Traducción en curso.

Esta guía aún no se ha traducido al ES. A continuación se muestra la versión en inglés.

Length is the most-converted quantity on the web, and the one where small errors do real damage. A 1% slip on a 100-meter building plan is a full meter of misalignment; a misread mile-versus-kilometer on a navigation chart can cost an aircraft thousands of feet. This guide covers every length unit our converter supports — what each one is, when it appeared, where it's used, and where people consistently get it wrong. By the end you'll know why a US survey foot stopped being legal in 2023, why the kilometer beat the league, and how to pick the right unit when a spec is ambiguous.

What is length?

Length is the one-dimensional distance between two points. It is the simplest geometric quantity and the only one that maps directly to a single number on a ruler — area, volume, speed, and density all derive from it. Because length is so fundamental, every civilization has invented its own units, usually tied to body parts (foot, cubit, span) or to surveying tools (rod, chain, league). Modern science consolidated those traditions into the meter, which since 1983 has been defined by the speed of light: 1 metre is the distance light travels in a vacuum in 1/299,792,458 of a second. Every other length unit is now defined as a fixed multiple or fraction of the meter, including the US foot.

We still keep many units around because they encode useful intuitions — a foot is roughly the length of a foot, an inch is roughly a thumb, a meter is roughly an adult stride. The skill is knowing which unit fits which context, and which conversion factors are exact rather than approximate.

History of length measurement

Before the 18th century, length was local. Cities defined their own foot; even within England the rod, perch, and pole differed by region and trade. Trade across borders meant constant arithmetic and constant cheating. The French Revolution triggered the first serious unification: in 1795 the National Convention adopted the metre as one ten-millionth of the distance from the equator to the North Pole along the Paris meridian, and the Système métrique began spreading across Europe through the 19th century.

The kilometer entered everyday use in France and its neighbours during that century, and the Metre Convention of 1875 turned the metric system into an international treaty. Britain held out longer — the Weights and Measures Act 1824 codified the imperial yard, foot, and inch — and the United States followed British practice until the 1959 International Yard and Pound Agreement, which fixed 1 yard = 0.9144 metres exactly. That single line of legislation made the inch exactly 25.4 millimetres and the mile exactly 1.609344 km.

Two later corrections matter for engineers. The metre was redefined by light in 1983, removing any dependence on a physical artifact. And on 1 January 2023, NIST and NGS retired the US survey foot — a slightly different value used in older land-survey records (1 ft = 1200/3937 m, about 2 parts per million larger than the international foot). Surveys after that date use only the international foot. If you are reading historical legal descriptions of US land, check the date.

Units we cover

Our length category supports thirteen units across three families. The metric family — millimetre, centimetre, metre, kilometre — scales by powers of ten and underpins virtually all science and most of the world's daily use. The imperial / US customary family — inch, foot, yard, mile — is locked to the metric family through the 1959 agreement but keeps its own labels and conventions. The specialised family handles extremes: the micrometre (10⁻⁶ m) for cells and machining tolerances, the nanometre (10⁻⁹ m) for wavelengths and semiconductor process nodes, the nautical mile (exactly 1,852 m, one minute of arc along a meridian) for marine and air navigation, and the light-year and parsec for astronomy.

Every unit in this category shares the same conversion approach: every value passes through the metre as the common base. That single design choice eliminates the rounding drift you see on chained spreadsheet conversions (mile → metre → foot, for example).

How to convert

Every length conversion on Calcflux is a two-step trip: from the source unit to the metre, then from the metre to the target unit. That's it. The route is always exact because each step is a single multiplication by a constant — there are no non-linear length scales, unlike temperature. The exact conversion factors and their authoritative sources are documented on the Calcflux methodology page, with NIST SP 811 cited as the upstream reference for the imperial-to-metric chain.

If you want to verify a conversion by hand, multiply by the published factor and don't truncate intermediate digits. For pen-and-paper work, the most useful exact factors to memorise are 1 inch = 25.4 mm, 1 foot = 0.3048 m, 1 mile = 1.609344 km, and 1 nautical mile = 1.852 km. Everything else follows.

Common conversions you'll need

Five conversions cover the majority of real searches. Kilometres to miles dominates road-trip planning and fitness apps — the constant is 0.621371 mi per km. Miles to kilometres is the inverse and runs the other direction on the same screens. Metres to feet handles building dimensions and ceiling heights at a factor of 3.28084. Feet to metres is the inverse for European architects reading American plans. And centimetres to inches is the most-asked conversion in clothing and DIY — exactly 1 cm = 0.3937 in.

For long-tail and high-precision needs, the full length comparison table lists every supported unit alongside its factor and a worked sample value. When you need a one-off number rather than a side-by-side table, the pair pages are usually faster.

Pitfalls and gotchas

The single most common mistake is confusing US and UK miles, which is harmless — they're the same value — with confusing US and UK gallons, which are not. Length units don't fork the way volume units do. The real length traps are different.

Survey vs international foot: pre-2023 US land-survey descriptions used a foot that is roughly 2 ppm larger than the international foot. For a small lot this rounds away, but for a state-plane coordinate at the scale of kilometres the discrepancy is visible. If a document predates 2023 and uses 'US survey foot' explicitly, do the survey-foot math; otherwise default to the international foot.

Hands and other body-measure units: a horse's height is given in hands of exactly 4 inches, but the unit looks colloquial and gets mistaken for an inch-equivalent. The same applies to the fathom (6 ft), the rod (16.5 ft), and the chain (66 ft).

Significant figures: don't quote 1 inch as 2.54 cm if you're machining — quote 25.4 mm and keep the trailing zero. The factor is exact; truncating loses real precision.

Nautical vs statute mile: aviation and marine charts always use nautical miles (1.852 km). Mixing those with road miles (1.609344 km) introduces a 15% error.

Further reading

Side-by-side: the full length comparison table lists every supported unit with its factor and a worked sample. Definitions: see the glossary entries for metre, kilometre, mile, foot, and inch. Method and sources: the length and weight section of our methodology page cites NIST SP 811 (the underlying exact factors trace to the 1959 International Yard and Pound Agreement). Context: our piece on conversion mistakes that cost money walks through real-world disasters caused by unit confusion.

Conversiones destacadas